CSA defends its development structures amid lack of fast bowlers

CSA insists there are many Kwena Maphakas in the pipeline even though there seems to be a shortage of fast bowlers in the country. | ICC on X

CSA insists there are many Kwena Maphakas in the pipeline even though there seems to be a shortage of fast bowlers in the country. | ICC on X

Published Mar 9, 2024

Share

Obakeng Meletse

CRICKET South Africa (CSA) head of pathway Edward Khoza believes the state of our grass-roots cricket is in a good place and there are plans in place for the next two years that will see more talent being exposed, especially at the under-19 level.

The recent Test series between New Zealand and South Africa was a hot topic for months because of CSA’s decision to prioritise the SA20, which weakened the touring squad to New Zealand.

With South Africa’s rich history of producing quality fast bowlers, it was concerning that none of them seemed to hurry any of the New Zealand batters and very rarely hit the 140 km/h speed which makes a lot of difference at that level.

The recently concluded 4-Day Series final between the DP World Lions and Western Province added fuel to the issue as only Tshepo Moreki could hit the 135 km/h mark.

“Most of the players that are on the fringes of making the national team were all committed to the SA20, so we had to exclude everyone that was part of that process and almost select guys that are professional cricketers because we didn’t have any room to experiment and send just anyone to New Zealand just to get the tour out of the way. We had to get guys that were experienced,” Khoza said.

“You can’t judge our system purely based on the tour to New Zealand. A guy like Kwena Maphaka would have already played for South Africa A had it not been for the Under-19 World Cup.

“The issue of fast bowling was just a coincidental issue due to the SA20. Had it not been for the SA20, we wouldn’t be having this conversation.

“The player depth in the country was tested and if we can’t make up a team even when the SA20 have taken most of the players, could that mean that our grass-roots level is not producing enough quality or that the pathway system is not feeding to the domestic set-up?

“When it comes to the depth and various parts of selection, we don’t really have an issue with fast bowling because when you go back to the series against India, there were new fast bowlers introduced like Nandre Burger. Guys that can bowl 145km/h are a rare skill to find and it’s a process to get to someone like that.

“Every year we bring all our potential fast bowlers. We have a mixture of senior players and younger players. The bowlers are evaluated, and we include a sports science aspect and we put them in machines to see if the bowling action is sustainable and if the bowlers will be injury-prone with their action and try to rectify their actions.

“A guy like Nandre Burger has been part of that process.”

As with every other level above, the grass-roots level plays a key role in feeding the system and should be prioritised.

“From a pathway perspective we have various programmes. We have 15 members across the country, we have division one and two. Below that we have provincial academies where players are contracted and are between the ages of 19 and 23 and are on a three-year contract with the aim of being groomed.

“We take them to the national academy for a period of three months and we polish their skills further and we end that with a tour with other countries’ academies or a tour with other countries’ emerging sides.

“Below we have a talent acceleration programme, it’s there to deliver under-19 players. With that programme we already have players earmarked to be at the Under-19 World Cup for the next two years. They are not guaranteed to be there, but we are working with them to look after that cycle.

“The challenge is that the under-19 set-up is kicking players up and some are even ready to step up to professional cricket and some still need time to develop. A guy like Dewald Brevis or even Maphaka are good examples of players ready to step up.

“A guy like Richard Seletswane, we are faced with a challenge of a lack of black batters, but you can’t just throw him into the deep end as that might set him up for failure. But what we do with Richard for the next two years is crucial. We need to build enough foundation for him to develop and be able to progress.”

There has been an outcry that not enough players are produced from rural areas and the traditional schools are the only ones considered when looking for talent, and maybe this is why we struggle to widen our pool of players.

“Our school system consists of the traditional schools that have always produced players for us. They are schools that uphold the standards and assist in our transformation journey of changing the representation.

“We also have 33 schools that are part of our focused schools programme in which we invest money to expand our pool of talent. We lastly have the hub, which is an infrastructure. It speaks to disadvantaged schools that identify cricketers and form a team to play against the traditional schools to get them more game time.

“It’s not that players from rural areas are not being reached out to, but when a player has potential, they are given bursaries and they move from the hub to your traditional schools to be more exposed to better infrastructure and to give them a better chance of succeeding.

“When that player makes the national team, for example, they will be named as a player from the traditional school and not his hub club, and that’s where the confusion is maybe,” Khoza concluded.

Related Topics:

cricket