Music contracts constitute the backbone of an artist’s career, dictating crucial aspects such as financial arrangements and ownership rights.
Image: Pexels
As I scrolled through my Instagram feed, I stumbled upon a touching post from renowned South African singer Nomcebo Zikode.
In a heartfelt message, she revealed a disheartening truth: she and her record label, Emazulwini Productions, have yet to see a single cent from the global hit “Jerusalema”, a song that propelled to international fame in collaboration with Master KG.
This revelation is particularly tragic, given the song’s monumental success since its release in 2020.
“Jerusalema” became a viral sensation, uniting people across the globe during the Covid-19 pandemic with its infectious rhythm and inspiring dance challenges on platforms like TikTok.
Yet, beneath this celebrated facade lies a disturbing tale of contractual disputes and unresolved financial obligations.
In her statement, Zikode expressed profound disappointment following a legal defeat against Open Mic Productions, revealing that she had never received any payment for her work.
She described the Gauteng High Court’s judgment as “fundamentally flawed and deeply troubling.”
This legal tussle, which has been ongoing since 2022, has shaken the foundations of trust in the music industry and left artists questioning the fairness of their representation.
As the public reacts to Zikode's woes, fans and fellow artists alike are voicing their concerns and seeking clarity on her contract agreement.
Commenters on her post posed pointed questions, asking, “What did your contract say?” and “What kind of deal did you sign?”
In response, Zikode clarified her situation, stating that while her obligation was to deliver two albums for the recording label, she cannot fulfill this until she receives pay for the chart-topping tracks “Jerusalema” and “Xola Moya Wam”.
Zikode stressed that their initial agreement stipulated payments every three months, a commitment she believes has been significantly overlooked.
This situation illuminates a critical issue: the protections afforded to artists and the complexity of music contracts.
Aspiring musicians, intoxicated by the prospect of stardom, may often overlook vital details lurking within the fine print of their deals.
Although we may not have the full details of Zikode's agreement with Open Mic, her dilemma serves as a cautionary tale for newcomers navigating the intricate music landscape.
Music contracts constitute the backbone of an artist’s career, dictating crucial aspects such as financial arrangements and ownership rights.
In an industry that evolves at lightning speed, particularly with digital platforms challenging traditional business models, mastering the nuances of these legal documents has never been more vital.
As Zikode and her legal team work through the intricacies of the case, they remain hopeful that the outcome will resonate beyond their plight, galvanising a movement for greater awareness regarding artists’ rights.
Understanding the types of contracts
As the industry grapples with Zikode's situation, it is clear that artists need to understand the types of contracts they may encounter. Familiarity with these agreements can safeguard them against costly pitfalls.
Key elements to consider
When reviewing any contract, artists should focus on the following key elements:
Negotiation tips for artists
Despite the temptation to sign quickly, enlisting the help of a lawyer experienced in entertainment law is invaluable.
They can provide insights into the language of contracts, highlighting clauses that may be detrimental to your career.
A small upfront investment in legal consultation can save artists from significant long-term repercussions.
Related Topics: